43 Fewer Mass. Towns in COVID Red Zone; Mass. Has Received 1M+ Vaccine Doses

There are 43 fewer Massachusetts communities at the highest risk of coronavirus transmission than there were last week, health officials revealed. It's the fourth straight week that number has fallen.

Thursday's town-by-town coronavirus risk data -- which classifies communities' risk level on a scale from red, the highest, to grey -- puts 110 cities and towns in the red zone, from 153 last week. (See this week's full list of red zone communities below.)

Massachusetts' coronavirus metrics have been trending down since roughly the new year, seeming to signal that the state's second surge is abating. The drop in communities in the red zone may be another sign the surge is receding.

The Department of Public Health also released its weekly vaccine dashboard Thursday, which showed that more than 1 million doses of the coronavirus vaccine have been shipped to Massachusetts, with the pace of vaccinations increasing past the 200,000-doses-per-week mark.

Massachusetts has been proceeding through its vaccine rollout plan, and on Thursday began allowing anyone accompanying someone 75 or older to a vaccination appointment to get their own. But Gov. Charlie Baker issued a warning to anyone seeking to take advantage of the new rule after hearing "disturbing reports" of that happening.

See Thursday's weekly vaccine report here and the town-by-town coronavirus data here.

Massachusetts COVID Hot Spots

The following 110 communities are in the highest risk level as of Thursday: Abington, Acushnet, Adams, Attleboro, Auburn, Avon, Ayer, Barnstable, Bellingham, Berkley, Blackstone, Boxford, Brewster, Bridgewater, Brockton, Carver, Chatham, Chelsea, Chicopee, Clinton, Cohasset, Dartmouth, Dedham, Dennis, Dighton, Douglas, Dracut, East Bridgewater, Eastham, Everett, Fairhaven, Fall River, Foxborough, Freetown, Gardner, Georgetown, Great Barrington, Halifax, Hamilton, Hampden, Hanover, Hanson, Haverhill, Holbrook, Holyoke, Hudson, Hull, Lakeville, Lawrence, Leominster, Littleton, Lowell, Ludlow, Lunenburg, Lynn, Malden, Marion, Marlborough, Marshfield, Methuen, Middleborough, Middleton, Monson, New Bedford, North Reading, Norwood, Orleans, Oxford, Palmer, Paxton, Peabody, Pembroke, Plainville, Plymouth, Quincy, Randolph, Raynham, Revere, Rochester, Rockland, Rutland, Salisbury, Sandwich, Saugus, Seekonk, Shirley, Somerset, Southampton, Southborough, Southbridge, Southwick, Spencer, Springfield, Sterling, Sunderland, Sutton, Swansea, Taunton, Templeton, Townsend, Ware, Webster, West Bridgewater, West Brookfield, West Springfield, Westminster, Westport, Weymouth, Whitman and Winchendon.

Of those communities, four are newly in red on the list this week: Eastham, North Reading, Sunderland and Ware. Massachusetts as a whole is not in red.

And 47 communities dropped out of red: Agawam, Ashburnham, Barre, Berlin, Boylston, Braintree, Canton, Charlton, Chelmsford, Edgartown, Fitchburg, Framingham, Granby, Groveland, Harwich, Hopedale, Kingston, Lancaster, Lynnfield, Mansfield, Maynard, Mendon, Merrimac, Milford, Millbury, Millis, Nahant, Nantucket, North Attleborough, North Brookfield, Norton, Oak Bluffs, Pepperell, Rehoboth, Stoughton, Topsfield, Tyngsborough, Uxbridge, Wakefield, Walpole, Wareham, West Boylston, Westfield, Westwood, Winthrop, Worcester and Wrentham.

To qualify for the red, high-risk category under the new metrics, communities with populations under 10,000 must have more than 25 cases. For mid-size communities of between 10,000 and 50,000 people, they must have an average of more than 10 cases per 100,000 people and a positive test rate of more than 5%. And for larger communities of greater than 50,000 people, they must have more than 10 cases per 100,000 people and a positive test rate of more than 4%.

Previously, the state used the number of cases detected on average each day over two weeks to determine if Massachusetts' communities are at high risk for coronavirus transmission. The new list factors in population size and positive test rate.

Read this week's full report here, with data on communities' percent positivity, county- and state-level data and more.

The Department of Public Health is no longer including a map of the community-level risk in the weekly report. An official told NBC10 Boston that the map is no longer seen as being as helpful as it once was, now that coronavirus cases are being reported in most communities.

Mass. Vaccine Data

This week's vaccine report from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health shows that the state has now received 1,413,025 doses of the vaccine -- up from 896,300 in last week's report. Part of the increase is due to the inclusion this week of doses shipped to Massachusetts pharmacies through the Federal Pharmacy Partnership Program.

Thursday's report, with data current as of Tuesday, also showed that more than 200,000 coronavirus vaccine doses have been administered in Massachusetts within a week for the first time in the pandemic. Just under 150,000 doses were administered in the prior period, but this week it was up to 229,906.

Nearly 1 million doses have have been administered in Massachusetts by now. According to the state's new daily vaccine report, a total of 987,774 doses have been given.

The two coronavirus vaccines approved so far in the country's fight against the pandemic, from Pfizer and Cambridge-based Moderna, both require that people receive two doses, which are recommended to be spaced out over three or four weeks.

Vaccines are the key to getting society back to normal, since they have been found to offer the greatest protection from serious complications in people who are infected with the virus. The widespread distribution of the vaccines will trigger the final phase in Massachusetts' reopening plan, when restrictions will be lifted.

Vaccinations began in Massachusetts last month. See the Baker administration's plan for rolling out the vaccine here.

Changes to Massachusetts' Hot Spot Data

The weekly report has a history of somewhat abrupt changes.

When Massachusetts health officials first unveiled a digital coronavirus dashboard in early January, they stopped releasing town-by-town coronavirus metrics on a weekly basis, since they are included in the "city and town" tab of the interactive dashboard. It shows communities' positive test rate and overall testing rate, though not other metrics that were included in the old format.

"Data previously found in this report, including town-by-town cases and testing reporting, can now be found in the daily interactive dashboard," a note in that week's pared-down weekly report said. But a new version of the report was issued later that night brought back the data.

More major changes before that knocked the number of communities in the red zone from 121 to 16 as what was defined a high-risk community changed. Officials said the adjustment brought Massachusetts more in line with risk levels in other states.

However, the numbers grew again as the weeks passed, eventually rising to 190 communities in the red zone before the data switched to the interactive dashboard.

That week's report also dropped the map that displayed the town-by-town coronavirus data. It showed where in the state communities were at high, moderate or low risk of transmission, but officials said it was no longer very informative.

In the weeks before that, officials added information on COVID-19 clusters, both on where major clusters have been identified -- they're listed in the report with an asterisk -- and on trends among clusters.

The color-coded town-by-town data was introduced in August, and the Baker administration announced that the state would focus its strongest COVID-mitigation efforts on towns in the red category. Communities can only move to Step 2 of Phase 3 of Massachusetts' reopening plan, announced in late September, if they are not consistently in the red.

Before the introduction of that data, the standard for measuring hot spots had been the positive COVID test rate over the preceding 14 days. The Department of Public Health's weekly report still includes that information, along with other metrics like how many tests are being conducted locally and how many cases have been reported locally.

Some of Massachusetts' smaller towns had taken issue with having their risk assessed based on cases per capita alone. They said that, when a town only had a few thousand people, an outbreak in just one household could send it into red under the criteria at the time: 8 cases of COVID-19 per 100,000 residents.