Donald Trump

Group objecting to Trump's place on Mass. ballot appeals to top state court

The appeal requests that the Supreme Judicial Court declare Trump is ineligible to appear on the primary ballot itself or declare that the Massachusetts State Ballot Law Commission is the right body to consider the objections

Former President Donald Trump listens as he speaks with reporters while in flight on his plane after a campaign rally at Waco Regional Airport, in Waco, Texas, March 25, 2023, while en route to West Palm Beach, Fla.
AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File

The fight over whether former President Donald Trump will appear on Massachusetts' primary ballots is dragging on, with a group of people who've filed objections on constitutional grounds appealing to the state's highest court.

Earlier this week, the Massachusetts State Ballot Law Commission dismissed two challenges to Trump's eligibility on the ballot for the March election on the grounds that the objectors, who included former Boston Mayor Kim Janey, didn't have standing. That cleared the way for Trump's name to appear.

WATCH ANYTIME FOR FREE

icon

Stream NBC10 Boston news for free, 24/7, wherever you are.

The appeal, filed Tuesday, requests that the Supreme Judicial Court declare Trump is ineligible to appear on the primary ballot itself or declare that the commission is the right body to consider the objections.

The court ordered responses from the commission, Trump, the state Republican Party and Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin by Thursday at 4 p.m., according to a filing.

The ballot commission spent much of a recent hearing focused on whether it had jurisdiction to keep Trump off the ballot based on the objections, which said the former president can't be on the ballot because the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution bars people who "engaged in insurrection" from holding federal office.

The State Ballot Law Commission taking up arguments to keep Donald Trump off the primary ballot with the election about six weeks away.

At that hearing, Trump attorney Marc Salinas argued that the objectors' argument is based on the process for a candidate being placed on the ballot via nomination or nomination papers, whereas Trump was placed on the ballot at the request of Massachusetts Republican Party, which also filed to dismiss the objections.

"There is nothing in the case law or the statutes … that says qualification to be on the ballot is a precondition to appear on the ballot," Salinas said, suggesting that even a 12-year-old could be named on the ballot, despite not being able to serve in the role.

Monday's ruling found that the commission doesn't have the right to adjudicate that question.

The 14th Amendment was cited by Colorado's top court and Maine's secretary of state in barring Trump from their state's ballots for the primaries. Trump has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Contact Us