Massachusetts has been making big investments in offshore wind power as a source of renewable energy, but President-elect Trump has promised to pull the plug on the industry.
As key stakeholders meeting Tuesday, Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey asked, “why would you want to kill tens of thousands of jobs?”
Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey doubled down Tuesday on the state's commitment to offshore wind amidst signals that the federal government could soon turn far more antagonistic to the growing sector, telling a union hall audience that the partnership of organized labor and the clean energy industry gives the state "a special sauce" that positions it to continue its energy transition.
Development of a robust offshore wind industry is key to Massachusetts' decarbonization commitments and is seen as a sector that could provide an array of new jobs for residents. But President-elect Donald Trump, who dealt a setback to the offshore wind industry during his first term, has said about wind power that he intends to "make sure that that ends on Day 1" of his new administration in January.
WATCH ANYTIME FOR FREE
 |
>Stream NBC10 Boston news for free, 24/7, wherever you are. |
"Mark my words: We will show them. Because we're moving ahead. We'll show them," Healey said Tuesday at an event in Taunton, referring to skeptics generally. "We'll get this done, and people will be behind it."
Get updates on what's happening in Boston to your inbox. Sign up for our >News Headlines newsletter.
The governor spoke at IBEW Local 223 as union-backed "climate jobs" coalitions from Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island called in a new report for southern New England to "double down on offshore wind and go bigger and bolder on clean energy and high-quality union jobs."
Without speaking his name, Healey acknowledged that Trump's victory has clouded the outlook for the industry.
More Massachusetts news
"As we look ahead, there's a certain amount of uncertainty with the new administration. But I firmly believe that the fabric of this industry, of this clean energy industry, is strong. You know, we have private corporations, we have research institutions, we have incredible union leadership and unions, and we have our friends in the environmental community who we credit for so much of the advocacy and helping us move forward to this place of a better understanding that we need to act now," she said. "We have it in this room, all those players. So we're moving forward."
"The race is on," she added. "Whoever figures out best how to marry the technologies and where we need to go -- energy with the workforce -- is going to win, and we have a special sauce here that nobody else has."
Wind opponents at the right-leaning Mass. Fiscal Alliance say offshore wind is bad for the environment, the economy and ratepayers. The group recently told supporters that it will lobby the incoming Trump administration to settle wind-related litigation "in favor of all the offshore wind opposition plaintiffs" and to move to amend federal law to "remove offshore wind as an allowed option."
"Governor Healey will not be happy. Her administration’s regulators are some of the biggest cheerleaders for this boondoggle. The Governor will bellyache that the state has to meet its self-imposed, arbitrary CO2 reduction mandates and her allies in the media will make it sound like the world is coming to an end because offshore wind is dead," spokesman Paul Craney wrote in an email to supporters. "The reality is that even the federal agencies under the Biden Harris administration admitted, offshore wind will have a negligible impact on global temperatures."
The union-led groups said that Southern New England has experienced the most severe rise in average temperatures in the continental U.S. since the beginning of the 20th century -- average temperatures 3.5 degrees higher now in Massachusetts and Connecticut, and 4 degrees higher in Rhode Island.
In a report released Tuesday, the groups said their three states should now leverage incentives in federal laws like the Inflation Reduction Act, increase their offshore wind capacity targets, and begin "coordinating a large-scale offshore wind development plan that will over time lower average costs per megawatt of new capacity."
"A larger scale of development is also needed to meet the region’s rising demand for electricity while protecting the public from unnecessary rate increases. Using the IRA’s incentives, Southern New England can build out its regional offshore wind industry to achieve economies of scale that will drive down project costs for developers while reducing costs for consumers," the report says.
The union coalition's report points to a projection from the U.S. Department of Energy and National Renewable Energy Laboratory that offshore wind power prices "will halve within a decade" with the development of the industry, but later explains that the feds expect lower interest rates, supply chain maturation, and IRA incentives "to drive costs back down to pre-pandemic levels by 2030."
The pricing details for the state's latest slate of offshore wind projects -- 2,678 megawatts spread across three projects -- won't be available until contracts are put on file this winter and it is clearly a sensitive topic for the industry and its boosters in state government. The projects chosen in September are widely expected to cost ratepayers more than previous projects, and contract prices for similarly rebid projects in New York recently came in about 30% higher.
The Healey administration has only said that the next round of projects will be cost effective when compared to the cost of building other power generation projects in the future.
